So I find it quite sexist that they can show full frontal females in movies, but they won’t show a guys penis. Thats exploitation of women in my opinion. So a man’s penis is more sacred than a woman’s complete body? Its okay to view a naked woman, but not a man? A man gets the right to privacy of his body, but a woman does not? Seriously, our bodies were created equal therefore they should be respected equally, if a woman has to be fully naked, so should a man. Exposure should be up to the person, not to the viewer. A penis is no more explicit than a woman’s naked body in reality and film ratings, both are naked, both are reproductive, therefore both are just as significant as the other. Both bodies are equally as sexual, one does not succeed over the other in explicitness making them equal. Bodies are natural and if they are to be shown in an R rated movie then they should be shown equally.
Disclaimer: I am not saying our bodies are explicit in anyway, I mean this in a film situation where we have to think about movie ratings, whats appropriate for children etc. Our bodies in real life are not explicit they are beautiful, but movies involving sex and nudity is certainly not something most people want children to see, and that is why I use the term explicit, because it separates children friendly from adult friendly.
And I will say that Hangover Part 2 had penis and was rated R, very proud to hear that they are probably according to a recent article the first film to delve into that side of nudity for an R film! :)